After the Census of 2000, how have reapportionment affected the State Research Paper

After the Census of 2000, how have reapportionment touch the State of Nevada - Research Paper fontNevada is one of the 50 states of the linked States, situated in the west part of the United States Being one of the US states, Nevada participates in the apportionment in the United States, which involves a process of dividing 435 asshole in the House of Representatives among the fifty states in the United States. concord to the 2000 census report, the Nevada state had a total creation of 2,002,032 0f which 1,998,267 was house physician population and 3,775 included the united states population overseas for those whose hometown was Nevada. The article further states that the main aim of apportionment is to evenly distribute the congress seats among the fifty states. According to census determines the sum of exemplars that a state has in the United States House of Representatives. Those states with large populations are allocated more representatives compared to the low popula ted states. How reapportionment has affected the State of Nevada after the 2000 census Reapportionment is the process of allocation of seats among the fifty states in the United States based on the previous census. This allocation of the seats is determined by a states population. Reapportionment takes place after two years since the last census hence, after the 2000 census, reapportionment was through with(p) in 2003. . this apportionment population includes the adults, children, United States citizens, and immigrants. Importantly, Nevada received additional one representative for its state however, each of the fifty states is usually entitled to one representative depending on the population of a state. A census in the United States is conducted after each ten years. ... When the census is done, the results are reported to the president by the end of that year, thus the results of the census are employ to allocate the congress seats to all the states. There are four different t ypes of formulas that are used when apportioning seats to the states. One of the formulas is the method of greatest divisors this method divides the total population by the number of seats assigned to each state, such that every state is given the exact number of seats that it deserves. The second formula is the method of major fractions that was invented by Daniel Webster. It was used in the 1840s, in which it considered adding a seat to a state that had a fraction of a half and above. Alexander proposed a third formula in the 1850s that ensured that members were allocated to each state depending on the states population, while the remaining seats were allocated to the highly populated states. In 1930s, the formula of equal proportion arose in which it uses the states population and divides it by the geometric mean of a states present number of seats and the next seat. According to Rourke (1980, pp 7), reapportionment is viewed as a converter from the rural pattern to an urban domi nance. He also states that reapportionment is deemed to produce changes in states, even if the change is minimal. During reapportionment, every state is always expected to defecate at least one seat however, apportionment usually affects the distribution of votes such that those states that loose any seat lose a particular number of electoral votes. After a census, the population growth results assist in reapportioning, which has an impact on the number of votes that a state accumulates in presidential elections. According to Salam (2010), some of the states like Nevada may